Mack Pitts was killed by a truck during construction of an international terminal at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. His estate and children obtained a wrongful-death judgment against the truck operator, which apparently could not pay, and then sued the City of Atlanta and tiers of contractors for allegedly failing to require $10 million in automobile-liability insurance. The Georgia Court of Appeals held that Pitts was an intended third-party beneficiary and granted summary judgment to the estate. The Georgia Supreme Court vacated that decision. It held that the lower court had not fully analyzed the contractual context of the term “participants,” the distinction between the City’s insurance program and contractor obligations, or which specific promises Pitts was intended to enforce. The Court also directed consideration of parol evidence and whether each identified promisor breached a particular promise. It did not decide whether Pitts was a beneficiary, whether any defendant breached, or whether workers’ compensation exclusivity applied. The case was remanded for that structured contract analysis. Three justices dissented, reasoning that the contracts plainly intended to protect project participants and that the Court of Appeals correctly resolved the case.