The Atlanta Gleaner.

Legal News

Edited By George Washington

(Testing in progress)

George Washington Statue at Federal Hall

Cassirerv.Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation

CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Docket No.20-1566
DecidedApril 21, 2022
Reporter596 U.S. 107
JudgesSupreme Court of the United States
Tags
CivilProperty LawProperty TitleCivil ProcedureFederal JurisdictionStatutory InterpretationVacaturRemand
Case Summary

The heirs of Lilly Cassirer sued a Spanish foundation over ownership of Camille Pissarro’s painting Rue Saint-Honoré in the Afternoon, Effect of Rain, which had been taken from Cassirer’s family during the Nazi era and later entered the foundation’s collection. The dispute arose under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, which makes a foreign state or instrumentality liable in the same manner as a private party when an exception to immunity applies. The Supreme Court held that a federal court deciding the substantive property claim must use the forum State’s ordinary choice-of-law rules, not a federal common-law rule. The Court reasoned that the Act does not displace the normal state-law choice-of-law analysis for non-federal claims. It vacated the Ninth Circuit’s judgment and remanded for further proceedings applying California’s choice-of-law rules.

Opinion

Loading published copy…

The Far Side
Cassirer V. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation — The Atlanta Gleaner