The Atlanta Gleaner.

Legal News

Edited By George Washington

(Testing in progress)

George Washington Statue at Federal Hall

Chatham Countyv.Smith et al.

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
Docket No.S26A0699
DecidedOctober 14, 2026
JudgesAll the Justices concur, except Peterson, C.
Tags
CivilTax LawGovernment LawProperty LawConstitutional InterpretationStatutory InterpretationSummary Judgment
Case Summary

Chatham County charged owners in its unincorporated fire district a flat amount per parcel or an amount based on a building’s square footage. Owners sought refunds, arguing that the so-called fire protection fee was an unlawful tax on real property. The Supreme Court of Georgia agreed. The charge funded a service available throughout the district and was imposed on property owners rather than tied to each owner’s use of fire protection, making it a tax despite its label. Under the applicable state constitution and general law, a county tax on real property in such a district had to be based on property value. Because this charge was not, the ordinance exceeded the county’s taxing authority. The court affirmed summary judgment for the owners; it did not prohibit the county from funding fire protection through a lawful tax.

Opinion

Loading published copy…

The Far Side comic: I told you guys to slow down and take it easy or something like this would happen.