Club Madonna, a fully nude club in Miami Beach, challenged several city ordinance provisions regulating its operations. The district court dismissed some claims as unripe, found that the club lacked standing to challenge another provision as vague, and dismissed additional claims on other justiciability grounds. The Eleventh Circuit issued a mixed ruling. It held that several claims were ripe because the challenged provisions were sufficiently developed for judicial review, so dismissal of those claims was reversed and the case was remanded. Another claim remained unripe, and the club lacked standing to pursue its vagueness challenge because any compliance expense was not fairly traceable to the allegedly vague language. Those dismissals were affirmed. The published opinion explains the boundary between ripeness and mootness, the injury and traceability requirements of Article III standing, and the need to analyze each challenged ordinance separately rather than treat a regulatory dispute as a single justiciability question.