A party waited years before moving under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) to set aside a judgment as void. The Supreme Court held that Rule 60(c)(1)’s requirement that a Rule 60 motion be made within a reasonable time applies to motions invoking subsection (b)(4). Although a truly void judgment presents exceptional concerns and the permissible time may be generous, the Rules’ text does not exempt voidness motions from the reasonable-time requirement. Courts may consider the nature of the jurisdictional or due-process defect, the movant’s notice, prejudice, and the reason for delay. The judgment was affirmed.