The Atlanta Gleaner.

Legal News

Edited By George Washington

(Testing in progress)

George Washington Statue at Federal Hall

Curtinv.United States

CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Docket No.22-10509
DecidedAugust 28, 2023
Reporter78 F.4th 1299 (11th Cir. 2023)
JudgesWilson, Newsom, and Luck, Circuit Judges; Newsom, J., wrote the opinion and filed a separate concurrence.
Tags
CriminalTales From the CryptMurder & MayhemThe SystemFederal Sentencing
Case Summary

Curtin, who had a history of mental illness and threats against judges, mailed Magistrate Judge Maynard a filing that expressly threatened her with death and bodily harm and included a church video he said reinforced the threat. A jury convicted him of mailing a threat and threatening a federal official; the district court imposed 60 months, citing his threat history and racial animus. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed. The filing and video supported a finding that Curtin knowingly sent a true threat. Although the government violated § 4241(d)’s four-month hospitalization limit, the statute did not require dismissal of the indictment; release from hospitalization was the remedy. His unpreserved claim that all district judges should have recused did not establish plain error. The court upheld the Guidelines calculation because Curtin planned and tailored the threat, embedded a video, and tried to deliver it before mailing it, so the four-point reduction for a single instance with little deliberation did not apply. The 60-month upward variance was justified by his threat history and racial animus; any improper reliance on the sentencing judge’s religious experience was harmless. Judge Newsom concurred separately, urging clearer classification of sentencing challenges and ordinary preservation rules.

Opinion

Loading published copy…

The Far Side