Jamie Daniel appealed a divorce decree and reconsideration order concerning distribution of marital property and responsibility for expenditures made for the children and marital home. The Court of Appeals of Georgia affirmed several rulings but held that the trial court incorrectly concluded it lacked authority to require Travis Daniel to reimburse Jamie for specified expenditures made before the parties entered a consent temporary order. The court reversed that portion of the ruling and remanded with direction for the trial court to make the necessary factual and legal determinations.