McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc.v.McKesson Corp.
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Docket No.23-1226
DecidedJune 20, 2025
Reporter606 U.S. 146
JudgesKavanaugh, J.; Roberts, C. J.; Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Barrett, and Jackson, JJ.
Tags
Supreme CourtAdministrative LawHobbs ActAgency DeferenceStatutory Interpretation
Case Summary
A private party challenged the meaning of a federal communications statute in a civil enforcement action. The Court held that the Hobbs Act does not require a district court to accept an agency’s statutory interpretation as binding. The district court must independently interpret the statute while giving the agency’s reasoning whatever persuasive respect ordinary principles warrant.
Opinion
Loading published copy…

