Dorothy Marian Meadows petitioned to probate her mother’s will and codicil, while her siblings challenged them on testamentary-capacity grounds. After a jury found that the decedent lacked capacity and awarded the siblings attorney fees, Meadows appealed. The Supreme Court of Georgia held that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the verdict. Although the decedent had medical problems, episodes of confusion, and unusual beliefs before and after signing the documents, the record did not show that she lacked the ability to understand the nature and extent of her property, the people who might naturally receive it, or the consequences of executing the will and codicil at the relevant time. The court emphasized that a capacity finding requires evidence connected to the execution of the testamentary instruments, not merely evidence of age or later decline. It reversed the judgment.