The Atlanta Gleaner.

Legal News

Edited By George Washington

(Testing in progress)

George Washington Statue at Federal Hall

Millerv.Alabama

CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Docket No.10-9646
DecidedJune 25, 2012
Reporter567 U.S.
JudgesSupreme Court of the United States
Tags
CriminalCriminal LawCriminal ProcedureConstitutional LawConstitutional InterpretationSentencingMurder & MayhemRemandReversalDissentTales From the Crypt
Case Summary

Miller v. Alabama and the companion case Jackson v. Hobbs involved 14-year-olds convicted of homicide and sentenced to mandatory life imprisonment without parole. Evan Miller participated in a robbery, beat a neighbor with a friend, and set fire to the neighbor’s trailer; the neighbor died. Kuntrell Jackson was present during a planned robbery when a companion shot and killed a store clerk. The Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment forbids sentencing schemes that make life without parole mandatory for juvenile homicide offenders. Children are constitutionally different from adults because of immaturity, vulnerability to outside pressure, limited control over their environments, and less-fixed character. Those characteristics diminish the justifications for imposing the harshest punishment and require the sentencer to consider youth and its attendant circumstances before deciding whether a juvenile homicide offender should receive life without parole. The Court did not categorically bar life without parole in every juvenile homicide case; it required an individualized sentencing process. The Court rejected the States’ arguments that adult-transfer decisions, legislative practice, or Harmelin v. Michigan eliminated that requirement. The Alabama and Arkansas judgments were reversed and remanded. Justice Breyer concurred; the Chief Justice and Justices Thomas and Alito dissented in separate opinions.

Opinion

Loading published copy…

The Far Side