Wendy and Janet Norman alleged that a sperm bank misrepresented the characteristics of donor material and sought damages after the birth of their child. The Georgia Supreme Court reaffirmed that Georgia tort law does not permit damages based on the premise that life itself is an injury. The Court nevertheless held that this rule did not resolve every claim in the case. Claims alleging injuries independent of the child’s existence could proceed if they were adequately pleaded. The Court of Appeals therefore erred by treating the life-itself rule as disposing of the entire appeal. The Supreme Court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further consideration of claims not deriving their injury from the child’s life.