Tracie Quint crashed her car, showed signs of intoxication at the scene, and refused a state-administered blood test after an officer told her he was placing her under arrest for DUI and read the implied-consent notice. On appeal, Quint argued that her refusal should have been suppressed because she was not actually under arrest before the notice was read. The Court of Appeals of Georgia affirmed. It held that the implied-consent procedure was properly triggered because a reasonable person in Quint's position would have understood she was under arrest and not free to leave when the officer read the notice. The reasoning relied on the surrounding circumstances, including officers telling Quint she could go to the hospital or to jail, her inability to simply go home, and the officer's explicit statement that he was arresting her for DUI immediately before reading the notice.