The Atlanta Gleaner.

Legal News

Edited By George Washington

(Testing in progress)

George Washington Statue at Federal Hall

Rainesv.The State

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
Docket No.S20A0181
DecidedJune 29, 2020
Reporter309 Ga. 258
JudgesSupreme Court of Georgia
Tags
CriminalCriminal LawCriminal ProcedureSentencingEighth AmendmentSixth AmendmentConstitutional LawConstitutional InterpretationDeath Penalty
Case Summary

Raines committed the charged crimes when he was 17 and received life without parole. He argued that the Sixth Amendment and Apprendi required a jury, rather than a judge, to decide whether he was permanently incorrigible before that sentence could be imposed. The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. The court distinguished the factual findings that increase a statutory sentencing range from the constitutionally required determination under the Eighth Amendment’s juvenile-sentencing rule. It held that the Constitution does not require a jury to make the permanent-incorrigibility determination and that the sentencing court could make that determination. The court rejected Raines’s remaining claims and left the sentence and convictions undisturbed. All justices concurred.

Opinion

Loading published copy…

The Far Side