Strategic Law represented Pain Management and later sought to enforce a consent agreement after its former clients paid late. The trial court awarded some fees incurred through its first order but denied additional fees under the agreement and Georgia’s offer-of-settlement statute. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. It held that fees authorized by the consent agreement could include reasonable expenses caused by the clients’ failure to pay on time and that the trial court had improperly excluded some post-order enforcement work. But the court upheld the refusal to award statutory fees because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the offer and the requested amount did not justify an award. The court also rejected a challenge to a filing deadline. The decision distinguishes contractual fee rights from discretionary statutory fee-shifting and explains how appellate remand limits the expenses that may be attributed to the opposing party’s conduct.