The parents of Peter Torres sued after a sheriff’s deputy fatally shot their son during a rapidly unfolding domestic-disturbance response. Body-camera footage showed Torres ignore commands, throw an object, charge the armed deputy, and close to within a few feet as the deputy retreated. The Eleventh Circuit held that deadly force was objectively reasonable because the deputy confronted an imminent threat of serious bodily harm and had only seconds to react. In any event, no clearly established precedent made the response unlawful under materially similar circumstances. The court affirmed summary judgment for the deputy on qualified-immunity grounds.