The Atlanta Gleaner.

Legal News

Edited By George Washington

(Testing in progress)

George Washington Statue at Federal Hall

Trumpv.United States

CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Docket No.23-939
Decided2024-07-01
ReporterSlip Opinion, No. 23-939
JudgesSupreme Court of the United States
Tags
Supreme CourtPresidential ImmunitySeparation of PowersCriminal ProsecutionExecutive PowerConstitutional LawRipley's Believe It Or NotGovernment Logic
Case Summary

A former President sought dismissal of a federal indictment alleging that he attempted to overturn the 2020 election, arguing that presidential immunity barred prosecution. The Supreme Court held that a former President has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority, at least presumptive immunity for other official acts, and no immunity for unofficial conduct. Courts must classify the alleged acts without probing presidential motives, and protected official conduct generally may not be used to establish criminal liability for unofficial acts. Because the lower courts had not applied that framework allegation by allegation, the judgment was vacated and the case remanded.

Opinion

Loading published copy…

The Far Side