Before trial or sentencing, Clarence Ward appealed orders denying his motions to suppress evidence and dismiss a superseding indictment. The Eleventh Circuit dismissed the appeal sua sponte because those orders were not final, a suppression ruling is not immediately appealable by a criminal defendant, and Ward invoked neither the double-jeopardy nor Speech-or-Debate exceptions to the collateral-order doctrine. The dismissal was jurisdictional, not a ruling on the merits of his motions.