The Atlanta Gleaner.

Legal News

Edited By George Washington

(Testing in progress)

George Washington Statue at Federal Hall

United Statesv.Windsor

CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Docket No.12-307
DecidedJune 26, 2013
Reporter570 U.S.
JudgesSupreme Court of the United States
Tags
CivilConstitutional LawCivil RightsFamily LawTax LawFifth AmendmentEqual ProtectionStandingMootnessLandmark RulingDissent
Case Summary

Edith Windsor married Thea Spyer in Canada, and New York recognized the marriage. After Spyer died, Windsor paid $363,053 in federal estate taxes because Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) excluded same-sex spouses from federal recognition and denied her the marital exemption. The Internal Revenue Service rejected Windsor’s refund claim, and she sued. Although the United States agreed that DOMA Section 3 was unconstitutional, it continued enforcing the provision and refused to pay the refund, leaving a live controversy. The Supreme Court held that the parties could appeal and that Section 3 violated the Fifth Amendment. DOMA’s federal definition of marriage demeaned same-sex couples whose marriages States had recognized, imposed unequal rights and responsibilities across federal law, and lacked a constitutionally sufficient relation to the asserted interests. The Court affirmed the judgment ordering the refund. It did not decide the validity of DOMA Section 2 or whether the Constitution independently requires States to recognize same-sex marriage. The majority’s judgment was accompanied by dissents from the Chief Justice, Justice Scalia, and Justice Alito.

Opinion

Loading published copy…

The Far Side