Wisconsin Bell, Inc.v.United States ex rel. Heath
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Docket No.23-1127
DecidedFebruary 21, 2025
Reporter604 U.S. 140
JudgesKagan, J.; Roberts, C. J.; Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Jackson, JJ.
Tags
Supreme CourtFalse Claims ActGovernment ContractsStatutory InterpretationFederal Funds
Case Summary
The Court considered whether E-Rate reimbursement requests qualify as claims under the False Claims Act. Because the government provided at least part of the money requested by transferring more than $100 million from the Treasury into the relevant fund, the Court held that the requests were claims within the statutory definition.
Opinion
Loading published copy…

